Left click on image to enlarge.Monday, January 31, 2011
Saturday, January 29, 2011
The GOPs Slash-Spending, Balance-the-Budget School Lunch Program Illustrated
Left click on image to enlarge.Thursday, January 27, 2011
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
Monday, January 24, 2011
Saturday, January 22, 2011
Keith Olbermann's Final 'Countdown' at MSNBC Has the Stench of Comcast All Over It
Last night, Friday, January 21, in what I know must have been a surprise to much of his audience, Keith Olbermann announced this was the last "Countdown with Keith Olbermann," thanked his viewers and those who had helped put the show on the air over the years, and then calmly read a James Thurber story named "The Scotty Who Knew Too Much," the moral of which was: "It is better to ask some of the questions than to know all the answers." It was an odd, unsettling moment in the context of Keith's departure, and it's still not clear if Olbermann quit or MSNBC fired him, the only official announcement from MSNBC being an exercise in bland Corpospeak opacity:"MSNBC and Keith Olbermann have ended their contract. The last broadcast of Countdown with Keith Olbermann will be this evening. MSNBC thanks Keith for his integral role in MSNBC's success and we wish him well in his future endeavors."
Richard Adams, writing in The Guardian (UK), apparently believes Olbermann was fired:
"Keith Olbermann, the liberal, outspoken anchor of MSNBC's Countdown show, had his contract dramatically terminated by the US cable news network's parent company NBC on Friday night.
"Olbermann had two years of a four year contract remaining, worth an estimated $30m, and was the network's highest-rated personality, responsible in large part for MSNBC's orientation as a liberal, Democratic-leaning channel."
Although Comcast ferociously denies they had anything to do with this – and it is barely possible Keith simply refused to work for them and ended his contract by mutual agreement with MSNBC -- the juxtaposition of FCC approval to take over NBC/Universal and Olbermann's blink-quick departure reek with the stench of conservative mega-corporation Comcast sending a chilling message to the cable news network's employees – especially air personalities Rachel Maddow, Ed Schultz and Lawrence O'Donnell – that if they go too 'progressive' in their shows, if they pull back the curtain on corporate malfeasance and corruption with too much zeal and fact, they could find their contracts suddenly cancelled as well.
(The new prime-time MSNBC line-up, BTW, is O'Donnell in Keith's slot at 8:00ET, with Ed Schultz moving into O'Donnell's current 10:00ET berth. Rachel will stay in her current time slot.)
Thankfully, Keith is still owed $14 million on his contract, so he will have a chance to take a breather, review his options, and make a comeback elsewhere, perhaps even at the struggling third-place CNN. As Rob Soto at etidbots.com speculates:
"As for our opinion on what’s next for the liberal anchor, don’t be surprised if Olbermann ends up on CNN sooner than later. Their ratings are in the tank, their new Parker/Spitzer series is a disaster (with Kathleen Parker reportedly not very happy being there) and is a poor lead-in to the new Piers Morgan Show. The entire evening lineup needs a makeover, and fast. Olbermann reportedly still has two years on his contract and will get paid his annual salary of about $7 million. However, what is not known at this point if he has a non-compete clause in his contract that would prohibit him from appearing on a rival station until his two-year contract is over."
VIDEO: Olbermann signs off on final Countdown
I've been a regular viewer and fan of Keith Olbermann's since he first started Countdown eight years ago and I hope he shows up on the TV machine again soon; to paraphrase his sign-off, and mix in some Dylan Thomas, I wish him good luck, and I know he won't go gently into that good night.
© 2011 RS Janes. LTSaloon.org.
Friday, January 21, 2011
Thursday, January 20, 2011
Tuesday, January 18, 2011
Monday, January 17, 2011
Sunday, January 16, 2011
Friday, January 14, 2011
'DeLayed Reaction': The Hammer is Finally Nailed to Three Years in Jail
Left click on image to enlarge.Thursday, January 13, 2011
Tuesday, January 11, 2011
Sunday, January 09, 2011
Saturday, January 08, 2011
Friday, January 07, 2011
Thursday, January 06, 2011
Wednesday, January 05, 2011
Monday, January 03, 2011
The Tattlesnake – Clueless Wall Street Indulges in the Self-Delusion of the Wealthy Edition
… and it's nothing new.
As 2011 settles in, some things haven't changed, such as the investment bank aristocracy of Wall Street, already wallowing in obscenely large salaries, apparently believing they deserve bonuses for continuing to peddle worthless paper and hoodwinking their own customers. This addled belief, however, is nothing new.
Having misspent a part of my youth as an advertising director for a publishing company, I once had an opportunity to encounter some wealthy people at business lunches and dinners, and noticed a few habits of hypocritical thinking they had in common:
-- To a man -- and they were all men -- they believed, even the silver-spoon-born trust fund scions and coddled bosses sons, that they were 'self-made' and everything they had was attained by their own hard work, even if their wealth was derived mostly from dividend income, the result of a long-dead relative picking the right investments or starting a successful business.
-- Speaking of hard work, when these VIPs came in at 10:am to check the mail and sign a few letters, left for a two-hour lunch at 12:30, and then went golfing for the rest of the afternoon, leaving their overworked and underpaid secretaries to run the place, they would still insist that they had 'worked hard' that day.
-- Whatever their educational institution, Yale or Harvard or a state university, they all thought they graduated because they 'studied hard' and 'put their noses to the grindstone' even though some would laughingly brag, after a few too many martinis, about how they had hired poor 'scholarship brainiacs' or 'eggheads' to teach them how to cheat on their tests.
-- While every one of them abhorred any publicly-funded program that enabled poor kids to get a higher education, and especially affirmative action, they were blind to their own advantages, beyond just being born white. If Uncle Joe picked up the phone to make sure they got into the 'right' college, or Daddy was once a student and fast-tracked their 'legacy' acceptance into a university, that was fine -- just the way the world worked. Of course, left unsaid was how they would have been able to make their way through college if such financially-strapped 'scholarship brainiacs' were not there to help them cheat, just one of many mental cul-de-sacs that these sons of privilege passed by quickly, lest they get hung on their own conundrum.
-- Although all of them supported the war in Vietnam, none of them came close to serving in it. They either received school draft deferments like Dick Cheney; or, like Rush Limbaugh, had a note from the family doctor describing some dread condition that made them militarily unfit, but somehow didn't interfere with their golf game; or had a family-friend Congressman intervene to keep them out; or, like Junior Bush, had Daddy pull a few strings to get them easy 'Weekend Warrior' duty in the National Guard. Privately, they had little regard or compassion for the troops in the field; in fact, they believed them stupid and that the grunts should show gratitude for the opportunity that military service provided to raise their lowly selves out of the ghetto or trailer park. Should they die or be maimed for life during this process of elevation – well, that's just the price they pay for not having the foresight to be born in better circumstances.
-- They all hated paying taxes, the hatred much more intense than that of those lower on the income ladder. Like Leona Helmsley, they thought taxes were fine -- for the 'little people.' A couple of them were said to spend more money on lawyers and accountants to avoid paying taxes than the amount they owed in taxes. But they didn't mind one bit freeloading off poorer folks by using roads, highways, airports, parks, and other public facilities paid for by the taxes of the non-rich; and they took it for granted their class would receive preferential treatment from cops and firefighters they didn't want to pay taxes to support. I won't even get into the courts, prosecutors, and military all arrayed to protect their precious property that they also didn't want to pay for -- suffice it to say that they didn't believe in any taxes for themselves, even for those things that benefited them greatly. It would be a mistake to take this as any sort of reasonable consideration on the subject of taxes; it is not – it's a nearly-hysterical emotional reaction born of mindless greed.
That's all I can recall at the moment, but the one thread running through all of it is the massive degree of self-delusion practiced by those with wealth. It's scary enough when they know they're lying to make a buck; it's pathologically dangerous when they buy into their own fantasies about themselves as have, it seems, the current crop of Wall Street scoundrels. In this particular case, it won't end until Richie Rich, ensconced in an office at Goldman Sachs, dreaming up the next fraudulent financial instrument for his firm to foist on the gullible public, hits bottom – an inevitability since they refuse to learn from their mistakes -- and seeks another 'loan' from the contemptible 'little people' taxpayers via the federal Big Daddy and, to mix metaphors, the cupboard is bare.
Then these Masters of the Universe will learn the tough lesson the cosseted Junior Bush as president had to endure: there are times when even Big Daddy can't save you from the hard consequences of acting like a spoiled brat.
© 2011 RS Janes. LTSaloon.org.
As 2011 settles in, some things haven't changed, such as the investment bank aristocracy of Wall Street, already wallowing in obscenely large salaries, apparently believing they deserve bonuses for continuing to peddle worthless paper and hoodwinking their own customers. This addled belief, however, is nothing new.
Having misspent a part of my youth as an advertising director for a publishing company, I once had an opportunity to encounter some wealthy people at business lunches and dinners, and noticed a few habits of hypocritical thinking they had in common:
-- To a man -- and they were all men -- they believed, even the silver-spoon-born trust fund scions and coddled bosses sons, that they were 'self-made' and everything they had was attained by their own hard work, even if their wealth was derived mostly from dividend income, the result of a long-dead relative picking the right investments or starting a successful business.
-- Speaking of hard work, when these VIPs came in at 10:am to check the mail and sign a few letters, left for a two-hour lunch at 12:30, and then went golfing for the rest of the afternoon, leaving their overworked and underpaid secretaries to run the place, they would still insist that they had 'worked hard' that day.
-- Whatever their educational institution, Yale or Harvard or a state university, they all thought they graduated because they 'studied hard' and 'put their noses to the grindstone' even though some would laughingly brag, after a few too many martinis, about how they had hired poor 'scholarship brainiacs' or 'eggheads' to teach them how to cheat on their tests.
-- While every one of them abhorred any publicly-funded program that enabled poor kids to get a higher education, and especially affirmative action, they were blind to their own advantages, beyond just being born white. If Uncle Joe picked up the phone to make sure they got into the 'right' college, or Daddy was once a student and fast-tracked their 'legacy' acceptance into a university, that was fine -- just the way the world worked. Of course, left unsaid was how they would have been able to make their way through college if such financially-strapped 'scholarship brainiacs' were not there to help them cheat, just one of many mental cul-de-sacs that these sons of privilege passed by quickly, lest they get hung on their own conundrum.
-- Although all of them supported the war in Vietnam, none of them came close to serving in it. They either received school draft deferments like Dick Cheney; or, like Rush Limbaugh, had a note from the family doctor describing some dread condition that made them militarily unfit, but somehow didn't interfere with their golf game; or had a family-friend Congressman intervene to keep them out; or, like Junior Bush, had Daddy pull a few strings to get them easy 'Weekend Warrior' duty in the National Guard. Privately, they had little regard or compassion for the troops in the field; in fact, they believed them stupid and that the grunts should show gratitude for the opportunity that military service provided to raise their lowly selves out of the ghetto or trailer park. Should they die or be maimed for life during this process of elevation – well, that's just the price they pay for not having the foresight to be born in better circumstances.
-- They all hated paying taxes, the hatred much more intense than that of those lower on the income ladder. Like Leona Helmsley, they thought taxes were fine -- for the 'little people.' A couple of them were said to spend more money on lawyers and accountants to avoid paying taxes than the amount they owed in taxes. But they didn't mind one bit freeloading off poorer folks by using roads, highways, airports, parks, and other public facilities paid for by the taxes of the non-rich; and they took it for granted their class would receive preferential treatment from cops and firefighters they didn't want to pay taxes to support. I won't even get into the courts, prosecutors, and military all arrayed to protect their precious property that they also didn't want to pay for -- suffice it to say that they didn't believe in any taxes for themselves, even for those things that benefited them greatly. It would be a mistake to take this as any sort of reasonable consideration on the subject of taxes; it is not – it's a nearly-hysterical emotional reaction born of mindless greed.
That's all I can recall at the moment, but the one thread running through all of it is the massive degree of self-delusion practiced by those with wealth. It's scary enough when they know they're lying to make a buck; it's pathologically dangerous when they buy into their own fantasies about themselves as have, it seems, the current crop of Wall Street scoundrels. In this particular case, it won't end until Richie Rich, ensconced in an office at Goldman Sachs, dreaming up the next fraudulent financial instrument for his firm to foist on the gullible public, hits bottom – an inevitability since they refuse to learn from their mistakes -- and seeks another 'loan' from the contemptible 'little people' taxpayers via the federal Big Daddy and, to mix metaphors, the cupboard is bare.
Then these Masters of the Universe will learn the tough lesson the cosseted Junior Bush as president had to endure: there are times when even Big Daddy can't save you from the hard consequences of acting like a spoiled brat.
© 2011 RS Janes. LTSaloon.org.
Sunday, January 02, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
