Hypocrisy Thy Name is Mitt

Inside the Romney Bubble

Mitt Romney Quote-to-Quote: Kids Are Only Work If You’re Rich

GOP Elite: Checkers or Chess?

Smug GOP About to Get Hit by the Sarah Palin Effect

Frank Luntz: GOP Word Turd

Like the Titanic, Rush Goes Down in April

Amazing Republican Feats & Facts

Mitt Romney and the Space Aliens

Like Taxes, Responsibility Is For the Little People

Left click on image to enlarge.

Happy April Fool's Day, America!

Left click on image to enlarge.

Crapitalism Rules?

Left click on image to enlarge.

Mr. Teabagger on Native-American History

Left click on image to enlarge.

Teabagger Teen Meets Jesus

Left click on image to enlarge.

It's A Wonderful Life 2010

Left click on image to enlarge.

The Tattlesnake – Thank God They're a Small Minority Edition

"It's plain hokum. If you can't convince 'em, confuse 'em. It's an old political trick."
-- Harry S Truman

Your Tattlesnake has had running arguments with various Teabaggers and Tea Party sympathizers for many months now and they all share the same tactic: Should you ask a question they can't answer or make a point they can't refute, they start screaming at you or rudely talking over you, as if the volume of their voice can eradicate reality and reason. This leads not to debate, but confrontation, and that seems to be what they want.

Beyond that, exactly how do you 'debate' people who insist:

-- There are no racists in the Tea Party movement;

-- It's Obama and not George W. Bush who started the TARP bailouts of the banks and Wall Street;

-- The terrible economy is exclusively the fault of Obama and his liberal social programs;

-- All of Franklin D. Roosevelt's social programs were complete failures;

-- Social Security, Medicare, the VA and the GI Bill were/are not liberal social programs;

-- Obama has raised taxes for the poor and middle-class;

-- Obama is a Muslim/socialist/communist (take your pick) plotting the downfall of the US backed by George Soros' money (and Soros was a teenage Nazi, too, incidentally);

-- Rupert Murdoch is completely different from Soros, since he's a loyal, patriotic American (Murdoch is, of course, from Australia);

-- Obama was not born in this country and the 'liberal media' is hiding the truth;

-- Sarah Palin has been shunned by the 'lamestream' media, despite the millions she's made from doting MSM coverage of her;

-- God has personally chosen the Tea Party candidates and opposition candidates are all the pawns of Satan;

-- The only economic system God approves of is free market capitalism (you can look it up -- it's in the Bible somewhere);

-- Jesus endorsed the death penalty; it's obvious because he – duh – allowed himself to die on the cross;

-- Liberals, not big corporations, are sending American jobs overseas to Communist countries like China in a conspiracy to position China to take over the U.S.;

-- Liberals hate big corporations because they make people work for their money and liberals hate people who work for a living; they just want to reward blacks and Hispanics with 'our' money for sitting around on their fat asses all day watching TV and voting for Democrats;

-- Blacks and Hispanics are taking all of our good jobs, thanks to affirmative action;

-- Liberals are the true racists who want to keep minorities poor and in the ghetto and use organizations such as the defunct ACORN and the two idiots in the New Black Panthers to intimidate and threaten anyone who might disagree; white liberals want to turn blacks and Hispanics into slaves again;

-- Unemployment compensation is a 'Democrat plot' to reward minorities who are too lazy to look for a job;

-- There is no separation of church and state; you only have the right to believe in the monotheistic religion of your choice;

-- Except Islam, of course, where they worship Allah who is nothing like the God of Jesus or the Yahweh of Judaism;

-- Jesus hated homosexuals, despite the fact that he did not refer to them in the New Testament;

-- Our Founders, like Thomas Jefferson, did not support free public education – that's an idea straight from Stalin's Moscow;

-- Liberals are vicious fiends who enjoy killing babies through abortion;

-- Liberals want women to work outside the home so that their children will be raised by state-run Obamacare centers and will become his personal army in the future;

-- All liberals worship Karl Marx, Hitler, Stalin and Mao;

-- All liberals are atheists who hate religion and especially Christianity;

-- All liberals love Islam and support terrorists;

-- You have no Constitutional right to privacy, and it's all the fault of liberals and Democrats;

-- Only Fox News can be trusted for factual information;

-- Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh are a great men and teachers of the truth, and the proof of this is that liberals hate them.

Since they won't believe any proof that contradicts what they are saying, are deaf to reason, and blind to their own hypocrisies and inconsistencies, it is impossible to have a lucid, adult conversation with them. In short, they're crazy and they'll drive you crazy trying to communicate with them.

Thank God these nutcases are only a small, if voluble, minority.

© 2010 RS Janes. LTSaloon.org.

The Tattlesnake – Debunking Five Current Media Myths Edition

"Those who cannot change their minds cannot change anything."
-- George Bernard Shaw

1. The Republicans are going to end earmarks. Ha, ha! Both parties, but especially the GOP, thrive on earmarks – not only does it bring home the bacon, but it's a nice covert way to reward their corporate sponsors. The typically devious Republicans, with the help of some Blue Dog Dems in the Senate, are just going to change the name to something like 'help American families add-ons' or 'freedom appropriation inserts' and continue to happily earmark away.

2. The Republican Party is now strong. Another laugher. The GOP had to rebrand as the 'new Tea Party GOP' in 2010 and none of their candidates dared campaign with Junior Bush. In TV ads, many GOP candidates did not even mention they were Republicans. Rand Paul, the only true Teabagger in the Senate, is now making noises like a "go along to get along" guy, and various naïve Teabaggers in the House, like the anti-government-paid health care dimwit who demanded his government-paid health care ahead of schedule, have begun showing their strong streak of stupid, even before January's official swearing in. Most of us have noticed it's not the mid-90s anymore, with the booming economy of the Clinton years, except for Republicans like Rep. Darrell Issa. Tying the House up in endless attempts to impeach Obama is not going to endear the GOP to a crumbling nation dealing with what is really the second Great Depression. And some of the Teabaggers may be gravely offended to discover that the GOP has been lying to them. It's going to be a fractious two years in Congress that won't come out well for the GOP in 2012.

3. The Republicans have a plan to restore jobs. Related to the item above, and every bit as hilarious, the GOP has nothing except 'tax cuts' (spin and repeat, ad nauseum), and that isn't going to create any jobs except at corporate PR firms trying to peddle the fraud that tax cuts are working to create jobs, and that's not nearly enough to refloat the fast-sinking economy. As the fading middle-class notices its nails are ripping off trying to hang on to what they have left, brand 'Tea Party Republican' will become a political curse as loaded with negative connotations as 'Communist' or 'Cheney' is today.

4. The Republicans can balance the budget. The GOP hasn't been able to balance the federal budget since Reagan took office, and without Clinton-inspired tax hikes and a few turns by Big Bill, there wouldn't have been a surplus in 2000. Since the GOP doesn't want to end two over-priced wars from which their corporate supporters are getting wealthier, truly reform our wastefully expensive health care system, remove corporate tax loopholes, separate commercial and investment banks, and cut the defense budget drastically, that leaves social spending like Social Security and Medicare on the block. The unvarnished truth: Even if the GOP junked all federal social programs, which they won't be able to do, they still wouldn't be able to balance the budget. In fact, with their tax cuts for the wealthy of prime importance, along with preserving corporate tax loopholes, they'll be adding another trillion dollars to the debt. They'll remain the 'put it on the credit card and blame the Democrats' party they've been for 30 years.

5. The Democrats lost because they went too far left. Au contraire, mon frere, as George Carlin used to say. Think of it: In spite of the corporate millions that poured into the Senate race in Nevada, the GOP couldn't score what should have been an easy victory. In California, progressive and GOP target Barbara Boxer prevailed, and the Tea Party proved its basic worthlessness in the "I'm not a witch" fiasco that was Christine O'Donnell in Delaware. Only in those areas of the country dominated by Fox News and AM radio right-wing talkers, and not much counter-balancing local media, where the Teabaggers could work without serious scrutiny, did they score wins, mostly against Blue Dog Dems. The reason a lot of Dems stayed home in 2010 is that they were tired of voting for progressive Democrats and getting Republican Lite. Obama and the Dems should listen to the wisdom of Harry Truman, a Democrat who prevailed during a bad time for Dems in the late 1940s, "Given the choice between a Republican and a Democrat who acts like a Republican, people will vote for the real Republican every time."

Obama and the Dems might also heed this advice from Give 'Em Hell Harry: "Carry the battle to them. Don't let them bring it to you. Put them on the defensive and don't ever apologize for anything."

But let's not expect too much.

© 2010 RS Janes. LTSaloon.org.

Rupert Murdoch's New Fox Tea Party Network TV Schedule

What will the defeated Tea Party candidates and their helpers do for a job now? Go to work for Uncle Rupert, of course!

Left click on image to enlarge.

The Tattlesnake – Jon Stewart WTF?!? and Other Miscellaneous Head-Slappers Edition

-- What is Jon Stewart playing at? I'm a big fan of The Daily Show star and think he's done a great job in the past, so it pains me to write this, but WTF?!? Okay, so to make his point at the Rally to Restore Sanity he tossed Keith Olbermann and Ed Schultz under the same bus reserved for Glenn Beck and Fox News. Last Monday, Olbermann graciously took his point and even cancelled indefinitely one of my favorite Countdown segments, "Worst Persons in the World." But the other day on TDS, here's Stewart heaping honey on Chris Wallace of Fox News and agreeing to appear on Wallace's "Fox News Sunday." Yes, he took a few mild swipes at Fox's obvious Republican partisanship, but he also equated MSNBC, the home of Olbermann and Schulz, to a AA ball club compared to the Big Leaguers at Fox. He didn't mean that in a complimentary way, but Jon can't seriously believe there is any parity between what Fox does and what MSNBC does. (For one thing, Fox doesn't give a liberal Democrat a three-hour weekday morning program, as MSNBC has with conservative Republican Joe Scarborough.) Put simply: Fox lies, as Stewart well knows, and MSNBC's progressive hosts, even though they may display passion for their side, don't. You can't possibly have a restoration of sanity without fact, and Jon Stewart knows that, as well. So, why is Stewart trying to make them both seem equal? A few possibilities:

1. Since the hosts at MSNBC won't be invited on Fox – even Ed Schultz is banned now, I've heard – perhaps Stewart sees himself as the voice of reason who can parry the thrusts of the Noise Machine and inject some truth into Fox's stream-of-conspicuous nonsense. To do that, he must maintain some semblance of being 'reasonable,' which means to the right-wingers attacking MSNBC and progressives. Note: If this is the case, Obama has tried this tactic for the last two years and just had his head handed to him. It doesn't work.

2. Maybe Stewart just has some personal animosity toward Olbermann and Schultz and he's taking it out this way. That would be mighty petty of him, but nobody's perfect, particularly in an ego-driven arena like show business.

3. This is the ugly one: Comedy Central is owned by corporate media giant Viacom and it's possible they finally noticed TDS and Stewart have had quite an impact on recent elections and the voting trends of those under 30. Was Stewart brought in by Bush-backer and Viacom CEO Sumner Redstone for a pointed "Network" reminder of who signs his paychecks and told to back off? I have noticed Jon has been much more civil to right-wingers this year, even bottom of the barrel types like Bill O'Reilly. I'd hate to think the reason he's promoting this 'equivalency' is that he doesn't want to end up back humping the comedy club circuit doing 300 "Hey, I'll be at McLaughington's in Akron on Friday!" road gigs a year. He's now a middle-aged man with a home, wife, family and a pile of bills – powerful reasons to toe the corporate line.

4. And this is the really horrible one: Perhaps his head is being turned by the 'charm' of the right-wing corporatists; they can be very persuasive 'good guys' in person, unless you remember the whole fetid history of the Republican Party of the past 30 years. I recall when Dennis Miller had his HBO show years ago: first he brought on right-wingers to lightly mock them, as Stewart does; then he had them on to explain their positions while he nodded his head; then he became one of the Pod People himself. Miller should be a warning of what happens to those who turn their backs on sanity and the facts – they end up losing their core audience, and money, as they perform for a bunch of dimwit thumbsuckers who don't get their jokes.

5. Even more horrible than the last one: Stewart is angling for a nice, long-term berth at Fox hosting a TDS-style political satire show. It's no secret Roger Ailes has been looking to compete with TDS; what better way than to back up Murdoch's money truck and hire away Stewart? (Think Karl Rove: attack their strong point.) I'd hate to think this is Stewart's motivation, but it's a possibility.

Whatever the reason is, I wish Stewart would, in the interest of fairness, have Olbermann and Schultz as guests on his show to present their side, as he does with the Fox Newsers. (And Olbermann and Schultz should reciprocate by having Stewart on their shows to explain himself.) Let's clear the air.

I hope this is all a tiff among friends, rather than the creation of another Miller monstrosity or Ailes attack dog.

(H/T to Bartcop.com for the graphic.)

-- Uh, oh, it looks like Obama is in full capitulation mode on tax cuts for the rich. Instead, why doesn't he call the GOP's bluff on the issue of tax cuts by countering with this proposal: Reduce the top tax rate on individuals and corporations earning over $250K per year to 30 percent, with this caveat: All loopholes will be eliminated and the Estate Tax will return to 1980 levels. That means every corporation and wealthy individual will pay 30 cents of every dollar in taxes, no exceptions. In the tax rates below the top bracket, persons and businesses earning between $100K and $250K will pay 20 percent; those earning 70K to $100K will pay 10 percent, 20K to 70K will pay 5 percent, and those earning under 20K will pay no federal income tax at all. No loopholes, dodges, or tax havens for any of them, with the added benefit that the public will have an easier time of filing tax returns, while the IRS will be able to more cheaply enforce the tax laws and process returns, saving the taxpayers money. Will it happen? Probably not.

-- One final note: Why did nearly all of the high-profile national Tea Party candidates – Angle, O'Donnell, Buck, McMahon, and, as now seems likely, Joe Miller – lose while so many were elected to the House? Easy – media coverage. In those areas of the country where local news has been decimated by corporate cutbacks, radio is dominated by Rush Limbaugh and his imitators, and Fox News is on in every restaurant and bar, the Tea Partiers were not confronted on their more wacky beliefs, their resumes were not closely examined, and they were not subjected to tough interviews, while Obama and the Dems were excoriated with constant Glenn Beck intensity. Without the help of massive infusions of corporate cash, Fox News, and the widespread ownership of radio by right-wing corporations that aid the GOP, the results would have been much different Tuesday. Although Thom Hartmann may disagree, this is why we need the Fairness Doctrine reinstated.

© 2010 RS Janes. LTSaloon.org.

What if Teabagger and Nazi Re-Enactor Rich Iott Was a Democrat?

Left click on image to enlarge.

Note: GOP Rep. Eric Cantor has publicly repudiated Iott, as has part of the MSM, but that's about it.